As for now, May 2013, I still have the following things to complete:
-writing the Core Plan with the Safety Procedures in the School
-carrying out the teaching practice, blogging, and writing the final report
-completing 2 more credits worth optional studies
-recording and editing a video from the teaching practice
-applying for the Certificate
I will write the core plan in the summer 2013 and then move on to do the teaching practice in September-October 2013. I will carry out the teaching practice in Savonia university of applied sciences in Kuopio, teaching basic Russian and business English courses for business and/or tourism students. Since the teaching practice must be done in English, I will need to teach an international group. I will keep blogging during the teaching practice phase, and after this I will write the final report.
I need to select one more optional course. I hope to find something relating to practical teaching or interaction skills. Due to my work I probably cannot travel and take a contact teaching course, which is a pity, because those courses have the best selection. I will look at some online courses, as well, either in Finnish or English with the idea of completing that in the summer.
My plan is to finish the studies by the end of the year 2013. I think the schedule is realistic, considering the fact that I work almost full time, but still there will be some flexibility to have my teaching practice in the schedule.
perjantai 24. toukokuuta 2013
torstai 23. toukokuuta 2013
VOC II closing: reflections on day 1
Today we have received and given feedback on the 5 topics that were covered during VOC II: global and multicultural activities, sustainable development, special needs education, interaction with working life, and entrepreneurship. It was nice to gather once again as a group and hear other people's processes, feelings, and ideas.
First we shared of our current situation and future prospects as a vocational teacher in pairs, and then presented each other's main points. For me, the biggest challenges have been educational science. This has been the most unfamiliar topic, and there is a lot of learn. Not only we need to master the numerous theories, but also apply them into our teaching, and consider which theory best suits a given situation. I am yet to complete the teaching practice, which I also see somewhat a challenge. On the other hand, these two entities are the ones are, and will probably be the biggest point of growing. It looks like about half of the group will graduate soon and other half will continue studies. I will carry on with the core plan and teaching practice, which I am looking forward to.
We received a compilation of feedback from the topic that we had prepared in small groups. Our topic was Global and multicultural activities. The general feedback suggested that it was relevant, interactive, and appropriate. The development points were to give more individual feedback of the tasks, and to have organized the page in a more user-friendly manner. These points were valid, but I was glad to see that the material was appreciated by the fellow students.
Finally we were to evaluate our current competences in these five speficic areas accoding to the criteria of Bloom's taxonomy. I gave myself a 5 (expert-level knowledge) on global competency. I have completed a Master's degree on intercultural communication, my current work relates to this, and I also have almost 10 years of firsthand experience of living in different cultures and interacting with a multicultural group of people.
Here is my evaluation of the competence areas that we studied during VOC II:
First we shared of our current situation and future prospects as a vocational teacher in pairs, and then presented each other's main points. For me, the biggest challenges have been educational science. This has been the most unfamiliar topic, and there is a lot of learn. Not only we need to master the numerous theories, but also apply them into our teaching, and consider which theory best suits a given situation. I am yet to complete the teaching practice, which I also see somewhat a challenge. On the other hand, these two entities are the ones are, and will probably be the biggest point of growing. It looks like about half of the group will graduate soon and other half will continue studies. I will carry on with the core plan and teaching practice, which I am looking forward to.
We received a compilation of feedback from the topic that we had prepared in small groups. Our topic was Global and multicultural activities. The general feedback suggested that it was relevant, interactive, and appropriate. The development points were to give more individual feedback of the tasks, and to have organized the page in a more user-friendly manner. These points were valid, but I was glad to see that the material was appreciated by the fellow students.
Finally we were to evaluate our current competences in these five speficic areas accoding to the criteria of Bloom's taxonomy. I gave myself a 5 (expert-level knowledge) on global competency. I have completed a Master's degree on intercultural communication, my current work relates to this, and I also have almost 10 years of firsthand experience of living in different cultures and interacting with a multicultural group of people.
Here is my evaluation of the competence areas that we studied during VOC II:
Global competence
|
5 -expert
|
Authoritative
knowledge and experience, long-term firsthand exeprerience in living in several different cultures,
creative viewpoints ,
working professionally in this field, MA degree in intercultural communication
|
Entreprenership
|
3 - competent
|
|
Special needs
|
2 - beginner
|
I understand the
concept and how it relates to vocational education
|
Interaction with working life
|
4 - procifient
|
I have a lot of
working experience of how labour market works, I have studied and practiced
work application skills,
|
Sustainable development
|
4 - proficient
|
I have quite a broad
exepriene on the topic, as well as several applications in real life.
|
keskiviikko 15. toukokuuta 2013
Educational Science
Today's topic was to dig into learning theories from the point of educational science. Among the theorists presented were Piaget, Émile Durkheim, B.F. Skinner, Maria Montessori, Lev Vygotsky, and David Kolb. Here are a few words on those who have impressed me most.
Constructivism
Constructivism teaches that learning is an active, constructive process, and the learner is the one who constructs and organizes knowledge. The learner links the former knowledge, past experiences, and cultural factors into new one, thus constructing his own subjective representation of the content. I will be able to apply the theory of constructivism into my teaching. I have been teaching English privately for professionals, who need special-field English in their work. In my coming teacher practice I will be teaching English or Russian language. Russian lessons teach the basic grammar, vocabulary, and communication from the beginning, and the English classes focus on professional language, such as Business communication and correspondence, or special-field English, e.g. for physical therapists. When teaching languages, it is important to construct knowledge and linguistic skills step by step, and former knowledge of other languages helps in this process. There were several theorists who contributed to constructivism, the most famous being Vygotsky with his Zone of Proximal development, Piaget, John Dewey. (Source: http://www.learning-theories.com/constructivism.html)
Learning outcomes
I learned that even though there are lot of theories and the best-known ones are very old, if not outdated, there is something in all of them that makes sense and can be applied to education. I don't think that one can apply just one theory into teaching; maybe there is one that best represents and suits the subject at hand, but I would argue in a successful teaching there are elements of many theories, or rather approaches, that a skilled teacher merges and mixes in suitable situations, applying different methods for a different group or even individual (just think of a special-needs student!). Even in one session there can be several approaches, for example when you teach a new language, there is group discussion through collaborative learning, then simple reciting of new words and pronunciation (positive/negative reinforcement), and tackling the grammar through constructivism, proceeding from the familiar and easy to more complex rules.
Juhani Pihlaja argues that since there are several different perspectives to many phenomena, much more theories are needed than in natural sciences or medicine. The theories are, in a way, discussion or dialogue with their objects, as well as the concepts, which are the raw materials of the theories. If the teachers are able to apply this understanding into teaching, educational materials, and exams, we could be able to lower the shaft of different theories, and at the same time we could approach the objectives and contents of (tutkiva oppiminen) and constructing the knowledge. (Source: Pihlaja, Juhani: Kiehtova kasvatustiede, p. 40)
Kolb developed his learning cycle
with two opposing dichotomies: active experimentation versus reflective
observation, according to learners’ preferences. The other contrasting
dichotomies are abstract conceptualization and concrete experience. These four
describe different learning styles. For the ones with the same learning style,
and the teacher can give them tasks that suit their learning style. According
to Kolb, these four areas represent steps of learning, so complete learning
occurs after a finished four-step cycle, or a certain student may use just
aspect. The four teaching and learning activities, are, respectively, a
diverger, an assimilator, a converger, and an accommodator. A student who will
master one learning style, will become successful in his trade. (Source: Wankat
& Oreovicz: Teaching engineering, pp. 292-296). This learning theory
attracts me, because it takes different character traits and personalities into
consideration. I have studied psychology and relationship studies and
learned that your message hits the target when you present it in a
listener-sensitive way, so that they can understand and relate to it. Students
are not an anonymous flock of people, but individuals with some recognizable
learning types. Analyzing and observing people comes naturally to me, and I
will definitely make use of this theory in my teaching.
B.F. Skinner’s theory is about
operant conditioning, and it falls into the form of consequence, with either
positive or negative reinforcement, which is represented by the teacher giving
thumbs up or down. The second scenario is positive or negative punishment,
where negative feedback is increased and positive feedback is diminished. The
theory seems a bit naive and simplistic, making me think of Pavlov's famous
salivating dogs. One thing does not work for everyone, but everyone needs
affirmation and cues that he is on the right track. The theory, as well as the
methods, implemented as such, are outdated, but of course every teacher aims to
give a student some credit for a work well done. When I look back to my own
days in school and university, the encouragement, recognition of my talents and
skills by the teachers have been defining moments in my career path. In
secondary high my Finnish teacher commented my good writing skills, and in the
university my Russian teacher always believed the best about my linguistic and
interpretation skills. And here I am, an interpreter and translator, writing
and using language in my profession, and loving it. Without those teachers I
may not have become aware my skills, and I'm ever grateful for my teachers,
even though I didn't always believe their ultra-positive comments at the time.
In vocational education, the idea of the operant conditioning theory is to
apply pedagogically appropriate outcomes by reinforcement. Thus, active
learners see results of work of action and project-based learning, feeling
proud of their achievement.
A Russian psychologist Lev
Vygotsky had ideas of facilitating independent learning with progressive
lessons, age-appropriate activities, and manipulatives, while addressing the
whole child. He argues in Mind in Society (1978) that learning is more than
acquisition of the ability to think: it is the acquisition of many specialized
abilities (the toys, games, books etc.) for thinking about a variety of things.
As far as adult learners are concerned, Vygotsky developed the idea of the zone
of proximal development, social development, and collaborative learning. The
latter works best in fields where you tend to focus on group projects on, such
as cooking, demo sessions, mechanics an so on.
Maria Montessori has another
inspirational theory. She developed her theory among the school-age children,
and it’s fundamentally a model of human development. Her philosophy was to
provide the children with an environment with a lot of activities and choice
with the emphasis on independence, freedom within limits, and respect for a
child’s natural psychological development. She believed that the children under
the age of six have an innate path of psychological development, and older
children and developing adults engage in psychological self-construction by
interacting with their environments. Monessori has stated: “Never help a child
with a task at which he feels he can succeed.”
Constructivism
Constructivism teaches that learning is an active, constructive process, and the learner is the one who constructs and organizes knowledge. The learner links the former knowledge, past experiences, and cultural factors into new one, thus constructing his own subjective representation of the content. I will be able to apply the theory of constructivism into my teaching. I have been teaching English privately for professionals, who need special-field English in their work. In my coming teacher practice I will be teaching English or Russian language. Russian lessons teach the basic grammar, vocabulary, and communication from the beginning, and the English classes focus on professional language, such as Business communication and correspondence, or special-field English, e.g. for physical therapists. When teaching languages, it is important to construct knowledge and linguistic skills step by step, and former knowledge of other languages helps in this process. There were several theorists who contributed to constructivism, the most famous being Vygotsky with his Zone of Proximal development, Piaget, John Dewey. (Source: http://www.learning-theories.com/constructivism.html)
Learning outcomes
I learned that even though there are lot of theories and the best-known ones are very old, if not outdated, there is something in all of them that makes sense and can be applied to education. I don't think that one can apply just one theory into teaching; maybe there is one that best represents and suits the subject at hand, but I would argue in a successful teaching there are elements of many theories, or rather approaches, that a skilled teacher merges and mixes in suitable situations, applying different methods for a different group or even individual (just think of a special-needs student!). Even in one session there can be several approaches, for example when you teach a new language, there is group discussion through collaborative learning, then simple reciting of new words and pronunciation (positive/negative reinforcement), and tackling the grammar through constructivism, proceeding from the familiar and easy to more complex rules.
Juhani Pihlaja argues that since there are several different perspectives to many phenomena, much more theories are needed than in natural sciences or medicine. The theories are, in a way, discussion or dialogue with their objects, as well as the concepts, which are the raw materials of the theories. If the teachers are able to apply this understanding into teaching, educational materials, and exams, we could be able to lower the shaft of different theories, and at the same time we could approach the objectives and contents of (tutkiva oppiminen) and constructing the knowledge. (Source: Pihlaja, Juhani: Kiehtova kasvatustiede, p. 40)
keskiviikko 3. huhtikuuta 2013
Observing the first English lessons
Today I
attended the first English lessons is the role of an observer. The place was
Savonia University of Applied Science in Kuopio, the department of social and
health care. The class was a 2-hour session on Professional English for the
1-st year Occupational Therapists. I friend of mine studies on this course, and
she asked the teacher if I could attend. This served also my professional
interests as I use medical terminology in my work as an interpreter. I have
contacted two other teachers, a Russian teacher and another English teacher, and
I will observe the rest of the classes on their lessons.
There were
27 students in the class, and few more were missing, so this was quite a large
group on my opinion. The occupation therapy education begins only every second
year, so maybe this explains the big group. There were students of all ages,
most in their early twenties, but there were a couple of 30-, 40,- and even
50-year-olds. I would call this a homogenous mix. Most students were females, but there was one
older man and another young guy. I have also heard from my friend that many
students already have children, so the students are not just typical teens.
The aim of
the lesson was to have group discussions on occupational therapy rehabilitation
exercises for stroke patients (or those with CVA, a new term that I learned,
meaning cerebro-vascular accident). In the groups of 4, we first read through
two sheets and then shared our content with other group members, using either
Finnish or English. It was a surprise that communication in Finnish was
allowed. One hour was allocated to sharing the papers and discussing. The pace
in the class was relaxed, and the students chatted quite a lot in the beginning
of the lesson. We then watched a 6:25 video on treatment of schizophrenic
patients. Normally the students would write down a few questions of the video
and then discuss, but today the rest of the time was used to prepare one of the
assessed tasks, role discussion in pairs.
Another
surprise was that the level of English command among the students varied a lot.
Few older students could hardly speak and understand, and they were given a bit
easier tasks and less reading. Even the young students, who have studied
English at school, did not comprehend all of the content of the reading
material. Also their pronunciation was quite poor and it was not corrected. I
learned that the English curriculum is divided into two parts, making up a 3
ect joint grade. The first half, 1 ½ credits consist of general vocabulary with
an essay to write, and the second part is professional language with a
listening comprehension, discussion exam, and the final exam.
The teacher
assumed quite a passive role, only instructing the students on doing the tasks.
He circulated among the students, but did not really comment on discussions.
However, the material was directly related to occupational therapy and it was
very practical. To me it seemed that the material is quite demanding,
vocabulary-wise, and the students were struggling with it, but it looked like
the teacher did not notice this. I learned that the majority of the material
used is American and Canadian, because they are the leading countries in
occupational therapy field. The teacher told me that he also teaches students
of other majors, and that finding suitable materials for the occupational
therapy is difficult to find. However, I saw a book that the students use that
was called Occupational therapists.
On the
final note, I wonder if learning did occur, or was the class purposefully
lighter for the students, because it was the last one. As a teacher, I would
want to make sure that each lesson has an objective and a learning outcome. It
could be that the learning outcome was to develop courage to speak English with
others, but I would visit the small groups and help the students by pointing
out incorrect pronunciation. To the teacher’s credit I want to say that his own
English pronunciation was very good with a British accent, but maybe he could
do a bit more to impart that skill to the students, as well.
keskiviikko 27. maaliskuuta 2013
Entrepreneurship, task 2.
Applying entrepreneurship education into teaching English
Part 1: Find a good, informative and
scientific article/video on applying entrepreneurship education in your subject
field. The purpose is to create a library of information that all students can
use in Task 2.
I found this is a bit tricky task, as my subjects English
and Russian language, as well as intercultural communication, are not
vocational, but general subjects. On the other hand, that’s why English classes
can be designed to suit any professional context. The most obvious ones for me,
considering my backgound in tourism business and international companies are
business and tourism studies. Thus, while the business students learn about
entrepreneurship in other classes, I can expand on vocabulary, dialogues etc.
in business negotiation situations, interviews and so on. Therefore I have
chosen some literature on those fields, because the search for
’entrepreneurship education in English teaching’ did not produce any results,
at least what could be considered appropriate or scientific.
The first article that I picked is an abstract of a study
carried out among the Business Administration students on curriculum factors
influencing students’ entrepreneurship intentions. Here is the link:
The research was carried out by
interviewing teachers of Business Administration and comparing the interview
results with results obtained from the Entre Intentio survey. Among the good
practices identified, the most important were the learning in teams, working with practice enterprises, developing
entrepreneurial skills and attitudes through dialogue, as well as co-operation with businesses. The
findings indicate that after the first year of studies, entrepreneurship
intention factors are emphasized only for the students who choose the
entrepreneurship orientation.
Business time article author claims that effective
entrepreneurship education must be built around real-world experiences, not
textbooks. So far teachers have not been expected to bring real
entrepreneurial experiences into the curriculum, which is strictly defined by
the K-12 objectives.
http://business.time.com/2012/05/23/why-were-so-bad-at-teaching-entrepreneurship/
Read more: http://business.time.com/2012/05/23/why-were-so-bad-at-teaching-entrepreneurship/#ixzz2OjbQAKxm
This third article on How Entprepreneurship can fix young
America (why not Finland) provides top tips of teaching entrepreneurship, which
can be applied by a teacher:
1)
Combine academics with the real-world
2)
Investing in and mentoring young entrepreneurs
3)
Teaching technology inside and outside the
classroom (I can relate to this!)
Task 2. Write an entry in their
blog/or post here on how they would integrate the methods in your coming or
post teacher practice.
I studied an article, provided by Teemu and written by
James O. Fiet on The Theoretical Side of Teaching Entrepreneurship. Mr. Fiet
suggests that there should be a solid study of entrepreneurship theory present
in teaching, not just giving real-life example of success stories.
Ideas/principles: looking the world through other
lenses than our own. In English classes, we can read selected literature on the
theory of entrepreneurship, then combine the task with finding central
vocabulary, making mini presentation in pairs in English and, to incorporate
the aspect of creativity, to have a written assignment, for example, a blog
post on students’ views and ideas about their own entrepreneurship, and how the
material relates to that. Then other students could leave comments. Another
task could be brainstorming with business theories with Popplet as the whole
class. This could be a homework, each student working on a shared Popplet. The
results and thoughts would be discussed during the next class.
I as a teacher could also simulate business
negotiations in a role play in English, where different students play different
characters, like an aspiring entrepreneur, foreign corporate CEO, a fellow
entrepreneur, bank/investment institution etc. One role play idea that is a lot
of fun for the students is to have two characters: an entrepreneur and a
potential client, to whom the former will try to sell his business plan that is
a real-life example, preferably his own that has been developed in other
business classes or courses. There are two more people involved: those who
verbalize the character’s thoughts. In other words, there is an actual
conversation going in English, and those verbalizing the participants’ thoughts
will also speak up after the character they are playing. This exercise combines
a lot of elements. Another objective would be to encourage students to use
English in spoken situations without taking themselves too seriously, because
the Finnish students tend to be very shy to speak English publicly.
The teaching style, suitable for my purposes is
project-based learning. First, the students have created a business idea and a
business plan in another class. Then we would study central vocabulary. Then
more vocabulary and phrases will be detected from a reading material, which is
closely related to entrepreneurship, either theories or lessons. Then the
students will give the mini presentation, and finally, they will incorporate their
knowledge in the role play, where they are encouraged to use the vocabulary and
other things they have learned. The topics which could be covered during the
lesson are taken from the article (p. 3), and are as follows: strategy/competitive
analysis, managing growth and discovery, idea generation,
risk and
rationality
, financing, and creativity.
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)