I had my
final lesson of teaching practice today. The topic was cultural heritage and
heritage tourism. On few lessons several students had not completed the
homework, so I had mentally prepared to give them some feedback on shaping up.
This time everyone had done the homework, and the students were active and
responded well to my interaction, so no rebuking was needed.
I had to
correct some details that I mentioned the previous time, such as different
types of conditionals and one certain phrase in an exercise, to which I had
said that both answers are correct. I had not had the correct answers key with
me and I had written my own answers to the task, and when one student had
chosen the other alternative, and I had said that both options can be used,
because I was unsure of the answer (If I would do this project again/If
I will do this project again).
The
students had the task of searching the definition for Cultural Heritage or
Heritage tourism and in groups of three make a small introductory presentation
of heritage tourism in a country chosen by them, and then present them for the
others. The chosen countries were interesting: Italy, Spain, Great Britain,
India, Indonesia. I was positively surprised by the effort and the level which
they managed to put into the 3-minute presentations. The students asked if they
had to do a PowerPoint presentation, and I told them they didn’t have to, but
two groups had done them in PPT format, and they were great. The Spain group
talked about the pilgrimage route of Santiago de Compostela, and they had a
great picture of the route. Another group, presenting Italy, had included a
beautiful picture of Venice. The group on Indonesia had chosen three sites that
they presented and they even mentioned that the next year is Visit Indonesia
year. I was very pleased and impressed by the students’ work and praised them
for that. One thing that I did not emphasize enough was the fact that the
students should have come up with a definition of what is heritage tourism.